Back to UAI  /  The platform

Accreditation documents built from the term, not from a scramble.

Feedback gathered during the semester rather than in the week before a deadline, and the documents each body expects generated from it directly, for AICTE, NAAC criterion 1.4.1, NAAC criterion 2.7.1 and NBA.

From a student's answers to an accreditation file.

01

Students answer

Each student sees the feedback forms for their own courses and submits them from the app.

02

Answers are kept apart from names

The record of who has submitted and the answers themselves are stored separately. An answer carries no name, email or timestamp.

03

Faculty see their teaching report

Each instructor gets a report on their own courses, including a view weighted by how regularly respondents attended.

04

The institution gets its documents

Evidence for AICTE, NAAC and NBA, generated from the same responses.

Prepared from the responses you already have.

AICTE

360° Appraisal, Section B

The students' feedback section, per faculty member, per academic year.

NAAC

Key Indicator 2.7.1

Student satisfaction as an internal aggregate, for use as evidence in your AQAR and peer-team visit.

NAAC

Key Indicator 1.4.1

Syllabus feedback analysis, with an Action Taken Report block for your IQAC to complete.

NBA

Course-exit survey

Indirect course-outcome attainment, course by course.

Anonymous by construction

An answer is stored with no name, email or timestamp, so it cannot be linked back to the student who gave it.

No report from a handful

Nothing is reported for a course until at least five students have responded.

One module of a platform the whole campus signs in to once.

What the institute gets
A record that was true when it was made, because it came out of people going about their work rather than out of a form somebody was asked to fill in.
Where the data sits
On our infrastructure in India, or on hardware inside your own campus. The AI that answers questions is a model we run ourselves, so nothing is sent to an external AI provider.
How to look further
The platform brief is the whole argument in one document, architecture and procurement included, with the limitations stated alongside the capabilities.

Talk to us about your institute.

A conversation, not a presentation. Tell us which department feels the problem most, and we will tell you honestly whether we can help. If we are not the right fit for you, we would rather say so on the first call than three meetings in.

Email us
uai@sleipnirtech.com
Opens your mail app with the subject already filled in.
What to write
Your institute, your role, and the department that feels the problem most. One line is genuinely enough to start.
We reply
Within two working days, to a person rather than a ticket queue.
Sleipnirtech Private Limited, New Delhi.